- Visibility 519 Views
- Downloads 385 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijfmts.2020.029
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Analysis of vitreous humour in determining postmortem interval (time since death) – A prospective study
- Author Details:
-
S Angayarkanni *
Abstract
Aim: Aim of the study was to find out post-mortem interval (time since death) on 100 cases which were brought for medico-legal autopsy at Institute of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Madras Medical College, Chennai by analyzing changes in biochemical markers in vitreous humour of both eyes.
Materials and Methods: Two samples of vitreous humour were taken from both eyes, first sample immediately after the body was received in the mortuary and second sample at the time of starting post-mortem examination. The samples were sent to the Department of Biochemistry for analyzing sodium and potassium concentration.
Observations: After the statistical analysis it was observed that p<0.001 which is a statistically significant data and concludes positive correlation of time since death with potassium increase whereas sodium falls as time increases which is not statistically significant. The study also showed the regression for vitreous samples with time since death as a dependent variable and depicts a linear correlation between time since death and increase in potassium. The T test compared values of sodium and potassium and it showed p>0.05 which concludes there is no significant difference.
Conclusion: It was concluded that there was a linear correlation between time since death and potassium levels in vitreous samples from both sides at different time intervals. There is no significant difference in values of samples from both sides. The study also concludes that sodium values are not statistically significant and shows negative correlation with time since death.
Introduction
‘Forensic Medicine’ or ‘Legal Medicine’ is the application of knowledge and principles of medicine for the purpose of law, both civil and criminal. Its main objective is to aid in the administration of justice.[1]
Forensic experts summoned to the scene of death are aimed to provide an estimation of the time elapsed since death. In forensic medicine and thereby criminal law, the important problem is to estimate the time of death. In the court of law, a medical practitioner has to give evidence as a medical jurist in order to prove the innocence or guilt of an accused. He has a great responsibility that he may be the only reliable evidence in the court of law.[2]
Post mortem interval is the interval between the death and time of examination of a body. This is important in knowing when the crime was committed. It helps police to start their inquiries with the available information and also in dealing the cases more efficiently. It also helps in including and excluding the suspects and culprits and in confirming the statements of the suspect. Estimation of time since death is useful in civil cases such as inheritance of property, insurance claims etc.[3]
Longer the post mortem interval, wider will be the limits of probability. Though the changes like cooling of body, eye changes, post-mortem staining, rigor mortis, stomach contents, bladder and bowel contents, decomposition changes and circumstantial evidence can sometimes yield a reasonable accurate result in early post-mortem hours, they are not reliable because of environmental factors. Hence forensic pathologists and biochemists have been concentrating on biochemical changes that occur in body fluids such as blood and compartmental fluids like vitreous humour, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, pericardial fluid and synovial fluid.[4]
Because of the lack of oxygen in the circulation, alteration in the enzymatic reaction and stoppage of production of metabolites, extensive biochemical changes occur in all body fluids. Such changes provide chemical markers which help to determine time of death accurately. [5]
These metabolites are products of metabolism and intermediates of smaller molecular size which have functions in normal growth and development of cells. They may be exogenous or endogenous changes and hence metabolite profiles are altered following death.[6]
The changes that occur after death have been identified and attributed to agonal period, changes in the early post-mortem period and diffusion of substances between various body fluids.
Biochemical markers are divided into two classes - metabolites and proteins. Sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, phosphate, lactic acid, hypoxanthine, urea, creatinine, uric acid, ammonia, catecholamines, ethanol are metabolites. Other class includes total proteins and enzymes aspartate aminotransferase and lactate dehydrogenase.
Immediately after death, the changes that occur in the chemical composition of body fluids such as blood, vitreous humour, synovial fluid and cerebrospinal fluid are described by thanatochemistry. After death, the electrolytes and the chemicals redistribute, cellular integrity is lost, energy dependent trans membrane transportation is absent. Hence it will be difficult to assess post-mortem blood samples. Because of the breakdown of the active membrane transport and rapid breakdown of metabolism after death, only stable analytes can be estimated in blood samples.[7]
Among the various body fluids like blood, serum, cerebrospinal fluid, aqueous humour, synovial fluid and vitreous humour, estimation of concentration of potassium in vitreous humour is the most widely used method.[8]
Vitreous fluid is an acellular , transparent, inert, colourless , hydrophilic viscous fluid that is present between the lens and retina within the eyeball which is an important supporting structure that serves the optical function. Its weight is approximately 4 grams and its volume is approximately 4 cc. It is composed of 99% of water with soluble proteins, amino acids, low molecular weight constituents, glucose, type II collagen, hyaluronic acid, inorganic salts and ascorbic acid.[9], [10]
It is more than 40 years that the biochemical changes in vitreous have been on analysis. The underlying principle in analysing vitreous humour is that it is a closed compartment which is separated from the rest of the body. But ambient temperature may influence.
The composition of the vitreous is closely related to that of serum, aqueous humour and cerebrospinal fluid. It is relatively stable, easily accessible, less susceptible to rapid chemical changes, well protected from decomposition and contamination. Hence it is more suitable for analysis than other fluids in estimating time since death.[11]
Eye and thereby Vitreous humour is well protected even in case of severe head injury and in burns. This was frequently remarked as “miraculous Escape”.[12]
Many studies have been conducted on analysis of sodium and potassium in vitreous humour.[13], [14], [15]
Concentration of sodium, potassium and urate were analysed in vitreous humour of both the eyes at the same time of death showed variation between the eyes.[16]
Many studies have shown that the vitreous potassium level increases with increase in post-mortem interval. [4], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41]
There was a linear relationship of increase in potassium concentration with increase in postmortem interval.[42]
As the post mortem interval increases, the potassium also increases whereas there is negative correlation with sodium and no correlation with chloride and calcium.[43]
Sodium concentration in normal body is 136-145 mEq/L. Potassium concentration in normal body is 50-55 mEq/kg of body weight of which 160 mmol/l ie. 98% of the potassium exists within cell whereas extracellular concentration is 3.5-5.5 mmol/l.[44] The normal sodium value in vitreous humour is 118-124 mmol/L and potassium value in vitreous humour is 2.6-4.2 mmol/L.[4] Potassium is actively transported from ciliary body into anterior vitreous and posterior chamber. Potassium is also contributed by the lens.[44]
Aims and Objectives
To study the use of vitreous humour in finding post-mortem interval
To compare the distribution of substances in between two eyes
To determine post-mortem interval even in decomposed and charred bodies
Materials and Methods
This study was carried out on 100 cases which were brought for medico-legal autopsy at Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Madras Medical College, Chennai-3. Cases which were admitted in hospital and whose exact times of death were known were selected for the study. Details of these cases were obtained from the hospital records, police records, relatives and friends. Cases whose exact time of death was not known and with previous history of eye or orbital injury or surgery, posterior segment diseases were excluded from the study.
Vitreous humour was collected from both eyes. First sample of vitreous humour was aspirated from both the eyes simultaneously as early as possible after the entry of the body into mortuary. Second sample was taken from both the eyes simultaneously at the time of post-mortem examination. The samples which were turbid and mixed with blood were discarded. The details of the cases were recorded.
Samples of vitreous humour were collected from the posterior chamber by aspirating gradually and slowly through a puncture 5-6 mm away from the limbus using a sterile 20 gauge needle taking care to avoid tearing of any loose tissue fragments surrounding the vitreous chamber.

The samples were sent to the Institute of Biochemistry, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Madras Medical College, Chennai-3.
The samples were analysed by Medica Easylyte Sodium/potassium analyser. It is a fully automated, electrolyte system that is microprocessor controlled. It uses Ion Selective Electrode(ISE) technology for the measurement of electrolytes in which are stored, an easily accessible quality control data. It measures sodium, potassium, chloride, lithium, calcium and pH of the serum, whole blood, plasma, urine, vitreous and synovial fluid. The calibrants are packed in a convenient solution pack with
Standard A solution, 800 ml (140.0 mmol/L sodium *4.0 mmol/L potassium *Buffer* Preservative *wetting agent).,
Standard B solution 180 ml (35.0 mmol/L sodium,16.0 mmol/L potassium *Buffer* Preservative*Wetting agent)
Wash solution, 80 ml (0.1 mol/L (Ammonium bi fluoride)
Ion selective Electrode method consists of a thin membrane across which only the intended ion can be transported. The transport of ions from a high concentration to a low concentration through a selective binding with some sites within the membrane creates a potential difference which is measured in Volts.

Observations
This study was carried out on 100 cases whose time of death was known who were brought to the mortuary, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Madras Medical College, Chennai-3 for post-mortem examination.
Samples of vitreous humour were taken at intervals. First sample was taken as early as possible after the entry of the dead bodies into the mortuary from both the eyes. Second sample was taken at the time of post-mortem examination from both the eyes.
Only the clear vitreous humour was analysed. Turbid or blood stained samples were excluded from the study.
The samples were analysed for sodium and potassium by selective ion electrode method.
|
S.No |
Time since Death (hours ) |
Sample I |
Sample II |
||
|
Number of cases |
Percentage of cases |
Number of cases |
Percentage of cases |
||
|
1. |
Within 12 hours |
53 |
53% |
31 |
31% |
|
2. |
12.1-24 hours |
40 |
40% |
57 |
57% |
|
3. |
Above 24 hours |
7 |
7% |
12 |
12% |
|
|
Total |
100 |
100% |
100 |
100% |
This [Table 1] shows percentage of cases depending upon time since death in sample 1 and sample 2 of vitreous humour of both eyes.
|
|
P value |
Time since death |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error |
95% Confidence Interval for Mean |
Min |
Max |
|
|
|
Lower Bound |
Upper Bound |
|
|||||||||
|
Sample I R Eye Na |
P<0.001 |
<12 hrs |
53 |
139.6623 |
9.51061 |
1.30638 |
137.0408 |
142.2837 |
126.50 |
157.90 |
|
|
12-24 hrs |
40 |
145.2725 |
7.76732 |
1.22812 |
142.7884 |
147.7566 |
125.10 |
158.70 |
|
||
|
>24 hrs |
7 |
137.3571 |
7.32481 |
2.76852 |
130.5828 |
144.1315 |
125.70 |
147.90 |
|
||
|
Total |
100 |
141.7450 |
9.12358 |
.91236 |
139.9347 |
143.5553 |
125.10 |
158.70 |
|
||
|
Sample I R Eye K |
P<0.001 |
<12 hrs |
53 |
6.9509 |
2.85628 |
.39234 |
6.1637 |
7.7382 |
2.90 |
18.60 |
|
|
12-24 hrs |
40 |
8.9075 |
1.76394 |
.27890 |
8.3434 |
9.4716 |
5.80 |
14.60 |
|
||
|
>24 hrs |
7 |
11.1143 |
3.74941 |
1.41714 |
7.6467 |
14.5819 |
7.20 |
16.30 |
|
||
|
Total |
100 |
8.0250 |
2.82311 |
.28231 |
7.4648 |
8.5852 |
2.90 |
18.60 |
|
||
|
Sample I Lt Eye Na |
P<0.001 |
<12 hrs |
31 |
142.0935 |
9.18633 |
1.64991 |
138.7240 |
145.4631 |
126.30 |
158.00 |
|
|
12-24 hrs |
57 |
141.8316 |
9.26536 |
1.22723 |
139.3731 |
144.2900 |
124.80 |
159.00 |
|
||
|
>24 hrs |
12 |
141.2750 |
8.20179 |
2.36765 |
136.0638 |
146.4862 |
126.00 |
151.80 |
|
||
|
Total |
100 |
141.8460 |
9.03689 |
.90369 |
140.0529 |
143.6391 |
124.80 |
159.00 |
|
||
|
Sample I Lt Eye K |
P<0.001 |
<12 hrs |
31 |
7.9323 |
3.21894 |
.57814 |
6.7515 |
9.1130 |
3.10 |
18.70 |
|
|
12-24 hrs |
57 |
7.4649 |
2.30732 |
.30561 |
6.8527 |
8.0771 |
3.20 |
14.90 |
|
||
|
>24 hrs |
12 |
9.9333 |
2.79686 |
.80738 |
8.1563 |
11.7104 |
6.90 |
14.90 |
|
||
|
Total |
100 |
7.9060 |
2.76240 |
.27624 |
7.3579 |
8.4541 |
3.10 |
18.70 |
|
||
|
Sample 2 R Eye Na |
P<0.001 |
<12 hrs |
31 |
140.6968 |
7.21722 |
1.29625 |
138.0495 |
143.3441 |
130.60 |
156.70 |
|
|
12-24 hrs |
57 |
146.3298 |
7.04151 |
.93267 |
144.4615 |
148.1982 |
128.50 |
165.80 |
|||
|
>24 hrs |
12 |
139.6417 |
7.50630 |
2.16688 |
134.8724 |
144.4109 |
126.80 |
149.40 |
|||
|
Total |
100 |
143.7810 |
7.67383 |
.76738 |
142.2583 |
145.3037 |
126.80 |
165.80 |
|||
|
Sample 2 R Eye K |
P<0.001 |
<12 hrs |
31 |
7.7839 |
1.88186 |
.33799 |
7.0936 |
8.4741 |
4.90 |
14.70 |
|
|
12-24 hrs |
57 |
9.9561 |
2.17420 |
.28798 |
9.3792 |
10.5330 |
6.80 |
19.10 |
|||
|
>24 hrs |
12 |
12.8917 |
3.49089 |
1.00773 |
10.6737 |
15.1097 |
7.90 |
18.10 |
|||
|
Total |
100 |
9.6350 |
2.74209 |
.27421 |
9.0909 |
10.1791 |
4.90 |
19.10 |
|||
|
Sample 2 L Eye Na |
P<0.001 |
<12 hrs |
31 |
140.7677 |
7.30823 |
1.31260 |
138.0871 |
143.4484 |
131.00 |
156.40 |
|
|
12-24 hrs |
57 |
146.4877 |
6.89241 |
.91292 |
144.6589 |
148.3165 |
128.30 |
165.30 |
|
||
|
>24 hrs |
12 |
140.2250 |
6.81604 |
1.96762 |
135.8943 |
144.5557 |
126.30 |
149.20 |
|
||
|
Total |
100 |
143.9630 |
7.53521 |
.75352 |
142.4679 |
145.4581 |
126.30 |
165.30 |
|
||
|
Sample2 L Eye K |
P<0.001 |
<12 hrs |
31 |
7.6129 |
1.77759 |
.31926 |
6.9609 |
8.2649 |
5.20 |
13.90 |
|
|
12-24 hrs |
57 |
9.8018 |
2.13897 |
.28331 |
9.2342 |
10.3693 |
6.80 |
18.90 |
|
||
|
>24 hrs |
12 |
12.5250 |
3.29162 |
.95021 |
10.4336 |
14.6164 |
7.50 |
17.70 |
|
||
|
Total |
100 |
9.4500 |
2.65020 |
.26502 |
8.9241 |
9.9759 |
5.20 |
18.90 |
|
|
Coefficientsa |
||||||
|
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||
|
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
||||
|
Sample 1 |
(Constant) |
.740 |
.170 |
|
4.355 |
.000 |
|
Right K Vitreous humour |
.100 |
.020 |
.450 |
4.986 |
.000 |
|
|
(Constant) |
.781 |
.175 |
|
4.463 |
.000 |
|
|
Left K Vitreous humour |
.096 |
.021 |
.421 |
4.592 |
.000 |
|
|
Sample 2 |
(Constant) |
.548 |
.189 |
|
2.899 |
.005 |
|
Right K Vitreous humour |
.131 |
.019 |
.574 |
6.940 |
.000 |
|
|
(Constant) |
.535 |
.194 |
|
2.751 |
.007 |
|
|
Left K Vitreous humour |
.135 |
.020 |
.567 |
6.816 |
.000 |
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: TIME SINCE DEATH |
|
|
Right Na 1 |
Right K 1 |
Left Na 1 |
Left K 1 |
Right Na 2 |
Right K 2 |
Left Na 2 |
Left K 2 |
|
|
TSD |
Pearson Correlation |
.004 |
.580** |
.004 |
.536٭٭ |
-.195 |
.611** |
-.173 |
.581** |
|
P Value |
.967 |
.000 |
.969 |
.000 |
.052 |
.000 |
.088 |
.000 |
|
|
N |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
99 |
100 |
|
|
Group |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
|
sample I Eye Vitreous Sodium |
Right |
100 |
141.7450 |
9.12358 |
.91236 |
|
Left |
100 |
141.8460 |
9.03689 |
.90369 |
|
|
sample I Eye Vitreous Potassium |
Right |
100 |
8.0250 |
2.82311 |
.28231 |
|
Left |
100 |
7.9060 |
2.76240 |
.27624 |
|
|
sample II Eye Vitreous Sodium |
Right |
100 |
143.7810 |
7.67383 |
.76738 |
|
Left |
100 |
143.9630 |
7.53521 |
.75352 |
|
|
sample II Eye Vitreous Potassium |
Right |
100 |
9.6350 |
2.74209 |
.27421 |
|
Left |
100 |
9.4500 |
2.65020 |
.26502 |
|
T – Test for timing 0 – 12 hours |
Group Statistics |
|
|||||
|
P value |
Group |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
||
|
Left Na Vitreous humour |
p>0.05 |
Sample 1 |
53 |
139.7415 |
9.38445 |
1.28905 |
|
|
Sample 2 |
31 |
140.7677 |
7.30823 |
1.31260 |
|||
|
Left K Vitreous humour |
p>0.05 |
Sample 1 |
53 |
6.9245 |
2.85986 |
.39283 |
|
|
Sample 2 |
31 |
7.6129 |
1.77759 |
.31926 |
|||
|
Right Na Vitreous humour |
p>0.05 |
Sample 1 |
53 |
139.6623 |
9.51061 |
1.30638 |
|
|
Sample 2 |
31 |
140.6097 |
7.09983 |
1.27517 |
|||
|
Right K Vitreous humour |
p>0.05 |
Sample 1 |
53 |
6.9415 |
2.85727 |
.39248 |
|
|
Sample 2 |
31 |
7.6903 |
1.85461 |
.33310 |
|||
|
T – Test for timing 12 – 24 hours |
Left Na Vitreous humour |
p>0.05 |
Sample 1 |
40 |
145.3875 |
7.70588 |
1.21841 |
|
Sample 2 |
57 |
146.4877 |
6.89241 |
.91292 |
|||
|
Left K Vitreous humour |
P<0.05* |
Sample 1 |
40 |
8.7575 |
1.75921 |
.27816 |
|
|
Sample 2 |
57 |
9.8018 |
2.13897 |
.28331 |
|||
|
Right Na Vitreous humour |
p>0.05 |
Sample 1 |
40 |
145.2725 |
7.76732 |
1.22812 |
|
|
Sample 2 |
57 |
146.3298 |
7.04151 |
.93267 |
|||
|
Right K Vitreous humour |
P<0.05* |
Sample 1 |
40 |
8.9075 |
1.76394 |
.27890 |
|
|
Sample 2 |
57 |
9.9561 |
2.17420 |
.28798 |
|||
|
T – Test for timing more than 24 hours |
Left Na Vitreous humour |
p>0.05 |
Sample 1 |
7 |
137.5429 |
7.34231 |
2.77513 |
|
Sample 2 |
12 |
140.2250 |
6.81604 |
1.96762 |
|||
|
Left K Vitreous humour |
p>0.05 |
Sample 1 |
7 |
10.6429 |
3.40385 |
1.28653 |
|
|
Sample 2 |
12 |
12.5250 |
3.29162 |
.95021 |
|||
|
Right Na Vitreous humour |
p>0.05 |
Sample 1 |
7 |
137.3571 |
7.32481 |
2.76852 |
|
|
Sample 2 |
12 |
139.6417 |
7.50630 |
2.16688 |
|||
|
Right K Vitreous humour |
p>0.05 |
Sample 1 |
7 |
11.1143 |
3.74941 |
1.41714 |
|
|
Sample 2 |
12 |
12.8917 |
3.49089 |
1.00773 |
|
Sample |
Time since death |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error |
95% Confidence Interval for Mean |
Min |
Max |
p value |
|
|
Lower Bound |
Upper Bound |
|||||||||
|
Left Na 1 Vitreous humour |
0-12 hrs |
53 |
139.74 |
9.38 |
1.29 |
137.15 |
142.33 |
126.30 |
158.00 |
p<0.001 |
|
12-24 hrs |
40 |
145.39 |
7.71 |
1.22 |
142.92 |
147.85 |
124.80 |
159.00 |
||
|
Above 24 hrs |
7 |
137.54 |
7.34 |
2.78 |
130.75 |
144.33 |
126.00 |
148.10 |
||
|
Total |
100 |
141.85 |
9.04 |
.90 |
140.05 |
143.64 |
124.80 |
159.00 |
||
|
Left K 1 Vitreous humour |
0-12 hrs |
53 |
6.92 |
2.86 |
.39 |
6.14 |
7.71 |
3.10 |
18.70 |
p<0.001 |
|
12-24 hrs |
40 |
8.76 |
1.76 |
.28 |
8.19 |
9.32 |
6.30 |
14.90 |
||
|
Above 24 hrs |
7 |
10.64 |
3.40 |
1.29 |
7.49 |
13.79 |
6.90 |
14.90 |
||
|
Total |
100 |
7.92 |
2.75 |
.27 |
7.37 |
8.46 |
3.10 |
18.70 |
||
|
Right Na1 Vitreous humour |
0-12 hrs |
53 |
139.66 |
9.51 |
1.31 |
137.04 |
142.28 |
126.50 |
157.90 |
p<0.001 |
|
12-24 hrs |
40 |
145.27 |
7.77 |
1.23 |
142.79 |
147.76 |
125.10 |
158.70 |
||
|
Above 24 hrs |
7 |
137.36 |
7.32 |
2.77 |
130.58 |
144.13 |
125.70 |
147.90 |
||
|
Total |
100 |
141.75 |
9.12 |
.91 |
139.93 |
143.56 |
125.10 |
158.70 |
||
|
Right K 1 Vitreous humour |
0-12 hrs |
53 |
6.94 |
2.86 |
.39 |
6.15 |
7.73 |
2.90 |
18.60 |
p<0.001 |
|
12-24 hrs |
40 |
8.91 |
1.76 |
.28 |
8.34 |
9.47 |
5.80 |
14.60 |
||
|
Above 24 hrs |
7 |
11.11 |
3.75 |
1.42 |
7.65 |
14.58 |
7.20 |
16.30 |
||
|
Total |
100 |
8.02 |
2.83 |
.28 |
7.46 |
8.58 |
2.90 |
18.60 |
||
|
Left Na 2 Vitreous humour |
0-12 hrs |
31 |
140.8 |
7.3 |
1.3 |
138.1 |
143.4 |
131.0 |
156.4 |
p<0.001 |
|
12-24 hrs |
56 |
146.6 |
6.9 |
0.9 |
144.7 |
148.4 |
128.3 |
165.3 |
||
|
Above 24 hrs |
12 |
140.2 |
6.8 |
2.0 |
135.9 |
144.6 |
126.3 |
149.2 |
||
|
Total |
99 |
144.0 |
7.6 |
0.8 |
142.5 |
145.5 |
126.3 |
165.3 |
||
|
Left K 2 Vitreous humour |
0-12 hrs |
31 |
7.6 |
1.8 |
0.3 |
7.0 |
8.3 |
5.2 |
13.9 |
p<0.001 |
|
12-24 hrs |
57 |
9.8 |
2.1 |
0.3 |
9.2 |
10.4 |
6.8 |
18.9 |
||
|
Above 24 hrs |
12 |
12.5 |
3.3 |
1.0 |
10.4 |
14.6 |
7.5 |
17.7 |
||
|
Total |
100 |
9.5 |
2.7 |
0.3 |
8.9 |
10.0 |
5.2 |
18.9 |
||
|
Right Na 2 Vitreous humour |
0-12 hrs |
31 |
140.6 |
7.1 |
1.3 |
138.0 |
143.2 |
130.6 |
156.7 |
p<0.001 |
|
12-24 hrs |
57 |
146.3 |
7.0 |
0.9 |
144.5 |
148.2 |
128.5 |
165.8 |
||
|
Above 24 hrs |
12 |
139.6 |
7.5 |
2.2 |
134.9 |
144.4 |
126.8 |
149.4 |
||
|
Total |
100 |
143.8 |
7.7 |
0.8 |
142.2 |
145.3 |
126.8 |
165.8 |
||
|
Right K 2 Vitreous humour |
0-12 hrs |
31 |
7.7 |
1.9 |
0.3 |
7.0 |
8.4 |
4.9 |
14.7 |
p<0.001 |
|
12-24 hrs |
57 |
10.0 |
2.2 |
0.3 |
9.4 |
10.5 |
6.8 |
19.1 |
||
|
Above 24 hrs |
12 |
12.9 |
3.5 |
1.0 |
10.7 |
15.1 |
7.9 |
18.1 |
||
|
Total |
100 |
9.6 |
2.8 |
0.3 |
9.1 |
10.2 |
4.9 |
19.1 |




[Table 1] shows number and percentage of cases from sample 1 and 2 which falls within the time intervals. It was concluded that in sample 1, there were 53 cases with time since death within 12 hours which constituted 53%, there were 40 cases with time since death from 12.1 to 24 hours which constituted 40% and 7 cases with time since death more than 24 hours which constituted 7% out of 100 total cases. In sample 2, there were 31 cases with time since death within 12 hours which constituted 31%, there were 57 cases with time since death from 12.1 to 24 hours which constituted 57% and 12 cases with time since death more than 24 hours which constituted 12% out of 100 total cases.
[Table 2] shows total number of cases N, Mean, Standard deviation, standard error, 95% confidence interval for mean and the range of sodium and potassium values of sample I & II of right and left eye. Each group have different values (<12 hours, 12.1-24 hours and >24 hours). The table depicts p< 0.001 which is a statistically significant data which concludes the positive correlation of time since death with potassium increase whereas sodium level falls as time increases. Hence it is not statistically significant.
[Table 3] shows the regression for sample I and II of right and left eye vitreous fluid with time since death as a dependent variable. The values of vitreous potassium and time since death were significantly correlated(r=0.450), (r=0.421), (r=0.574), (r=0.567)
[Table 4] shows the Pearson coefficient of 0.580 of sample I of right vitreous potassium, 0.536 of sample I of left vitreous potassium, 0.611 of sample II of right vitreous potassium and 0.581 of sample II of left vitreous potassium which has a significant correlation with time since death whereas sodium has negative correlation.
[Table 5] shows the comparison of sodium and potassium values of sample 1 and 2 of right and left vitreous. Statistical analysis shows P>0.05 which concludes there is no significant difference between right and left values.
[Table 6] shows the T test which compares the values of sodium and potassium of sample 1 and 2 of right and left vitreous with timing 0-12 hours,12-24 hours, and more than 24 hours. Statistical analysis shows p>0.05 for sodium values which is not significant whereas p<0.05 for potassium is significant. which concludes there is no significant difference.
[Table 7] shows the one way ANOVA for comparing sodium and potassium values of both sides for three periods in sample I and sample 2 respectively. It shows p<0.001 which is a statistically significant data which concludes that there is a linear correlation of increase in potassium with time since death.
Conflicts of interest
All contributing authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Source of Funding
None.
References
- Parikh CK. . Personal Identity. In Parikh’s Textbook of Medical Jurisprudence. 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Dr, Subrahmanyam’s. . Law publishers (India) Pvt. Ltd. 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Dr KS, Narayan Reddy. . The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. . [Google Scholar]
- Aggarwal RL, Gupta PC, Nagar CK. Determination of time of death by estimating potassium level in the cadaver vitreous humour. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 1983;31(5):528-531. [Google Scholar]
- Donaldson AE, Lamont IL. Biochemical changes that occur after death: Potential markers for Determining Post mortem. Interval PloS One. 2013;8(11):82011-82011. [Google Scholar]
- Vij K. . Textbook of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 2ed:Churchill Livingstone Pvt Ltd. 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Madea B, Musshoff F. Postmortem biochemistry. Forensic Science International. 2007;165:165-171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Coe JI. Vitreous potassium as a measure of the postmortem interval: An historical review and critical evaluation. Forensic Science International. 1989;42(3):201-213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Khurana AK. . Anatomy and physiology of Eye : 85. ;113:114-114. [Google Scholar]
- Jacobeic A, Fredrick. . Age related changes in vitreous-Structure, Principles and practice of Ophthalmology 2nd edition. . [Google Scholar]
- Saugstad O, Olaisen B. Post-mortem hypoxanthine levels in the vitreous humour an introductory report. Forensic Science International. 1978;12(1):33-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Sturner WQ, Gantner GE. The Postmortem Interval. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1964;42(2):137-144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Singh D, Prashad R, Parkash C, Bansal YS, Sharma SK, Pandey AN. Linearization of the relationship between serum sodium, potassium concentration, their ratio and time since death in Chandigarh zone of north-west India. Forensic Science International. 2002;130:1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- DSD, APaH, DPR, AP, DSSK. Research Fellow - Analysis of sodium and potassium in vitreous humour have been studied to estimate time since death. Double logarithmic, linear relationship between postmortem vitreous Sodium/Potassium electrolytes concentration ratio and time since death in subjects of Chandigarh zone of northwest India. Senior Lecturer, Mr. Pandey Avadh Naresh1. 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Chandrakanth H, Kanchan T, Balaraj B, Virupaksha H, Chandrashekar T. Postmortem vitreous chemistry – An evaluation of sodium, potassium and chloride levels in estimation of time since death (during the first 36 h after death). Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2013;20(4):211-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Balasooriya B, Hill C, Williams A. The biochemistry of vitreous humour. A comparative study of the potassium, sodium and urate concentrations in the eyes at identifical time intervals after death. Forensic Science International. 1984;26:85-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Dr. Vishal Garg -changes in the levels of vitreous potassium with increasing time since death. JIAFM. 2004;26(4). [Google Scholar]
- Sturner WQ, GE. Ganter - The postmortem interval; a study of potassium in the vitreous humour. Am J Clin Pathol. 1964;42(2):137-144. [Google Scholar]
- WMH. Hughes-Levels of potassium in the vitreous humour after death. Med Sci Law. 1965;5:150-156. [Google Scholar]
- Hansson L, Uotila U, Lindfors R, K. Laiho Potassium content of the vitreous body as an aid in determining the time of death. J Forensic Sci. 1966;11(3):390-393. [Google Scholar]
- J. Lie - Changes of potassium concentration in the vitreous humour after death. Am J Med Sci. 1967;254:136-146. [Google Scholar]
- Leahy MS, ER. Farber - Postmortem chemistry of human vitreous humour. J Forensic Sci. 1969;12:214-222. [Google Scholar]
- Madea B, Henssge C, Honig W, A. Gerbracht - References for determining the time of death by postmortem vitreous humour. Forensic Sci Int. 1989;40:231-243. [Google Scholar]
- Madea B, Kreuser C, S. Banaschak - Postmortem biochemical examination of synovial fluid-a preliminary study. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;118:29-35. [Google Scholar]
- J. Coe - Use of chemical determinations on vitreous humour in forensic pathology. J Forensic Sci. 1972;17:541-546. [Google Scholar]
- Swift PGF, Worthy E, Emery JL. Biochemical state of the vitreous humour of infants at necropsy. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1974;49:680-685. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Komura S, S. Oshtro - Potassium levels in the aqueous and vitreous humor after death. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1977;122:65-68. [Google Scholar]
- J, WSC. . Coe - Postmortem chemistry of blood cerebrospinal fluid and vitreous humor-Tedeschi. 1977;II:1033-1060. [Google Scholar]
- Blumenfeld TA, Mantell CH, Catherman RL, WA. Blank -Postmortem vitreous humour chemistry in sudden infant death syndrome and in other causes of death in childhood. Am J Clin Pathol. 1979;71:219-223. [Google Scholar]
- Choo-Kang E, Mckoy C, C. Escoffery - Vitreous humor analytes in assessing the postmortem interval and the antemortem clinical status. West Indian Med J. 1983;32:23-23. [Google Scholar]
- Farmer JG, Benomran, Watson WA. Harland - Magnesium,potassium, sodium and calcium in postmortem vitreous humour from humans. Forensic Sci Int. 1985;27:1-13. [Google Scholar]
- Devgun MS, JA. Dunbar - Biochemical investigation of vitreous; application in forensic medicine, especially in relation to alcohol. Forensic Sci Int. 1986;31:27-34. [Google Scholar]
- Stephen RJ, KG. Richards- Vitreous humour chemistry. The use of potassium concentration for the prediction of postmortem interval. J Forensic Sci. 1987;32(2):503-509. [Google Scholar]
- Sparks DL, Oeltgen PR, Kryscio RJ, JL. Hunsaker -Comparison of chemical methods for determination of postmortem interval. J Forensic Sci. 1989;34(1):197-206. [Google Scholar]
- AH. Singh -Potassium concentration analysis in vitreous humour for estimation of time of Death. J Forensic Med Toxicol. 1999;11(3-4):12-16. [Google Scholar]
- Lange N, Swearer S, WQ. Sturner - Human postmortem interval estimation from vitreous potassium; an analysis of original data from six different studies. Forensic Sci Int. 1994;66:159-174. [Google Scholar]
- Knight B. . The use of vitreous humour chemistry in timing death, Forensic pathology. 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Govekar G, Bishnukumar PC, Dikshit TK. Mishra - Study of potassium in vitreous in relation to death interval and cause of death. J Forensic Med Toxicol. 1996;4(1):26-28. [Google Scholar]
- James RA, Hoadley BG. Sampson - Determination of postmortem interval by sampling vitreous humour - Am. J Forensic Med Pathol. 1997;18(2):158-162. [Google Scholar]
- Pounder DJ, Carson DO, Johnston K, Y. Orihara -Electrolyte concentration differences between left and right vitreous humor samples. J Forensic Sci. 1998;43(3):604-607. [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhary BL, Veena M, BH. Tirpude - Potassium concentration in vitreous humour in relation to death interval. J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2007;24(1):26-30. [Google Scholar]
- NA. Sheikh - Estimation of potassium interval according to time course of potassium ion activity in cadaveric synovial fluid - Indian. J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2007;1:45-49. [Google Scholar]
- Siddhamsetty AK, Verma SK, Kohli A, Verma A, Puri D, Singh A. Exploring time of death from potassium, sodium, chloride, glucose & calcium analysis of postmortem synovial fluid in semi arid climate. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2014;28:11-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- William MH. . Singapore :Harcourt Brace and Company Asia Pvt Ltd. 1992. [Google Scholar]
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
Angayarkanni S. Analysis of vitreous humour in determining postmortem interval (time since death) – A prospective study [Internet]. IP Int J Forensic Med Toxicol Sci. 2020 [cited 2025 Nov 06];5(4):121-129. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijfmts.2020.029
APA
Angayarkanni, S. (2020). Analysis of vitreous humour in determining postmortem interval (time since death) – A prospective study. IP Int J Forensic Med Toxicol Sci, 5(4), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijfmts.2020.029
MLA
Angayarkanni, S. "Analysis of vitreous humour in determining postmortem interval (time since death) – A prospective study." IP Int J Forensic Med Toxicol Sci, vol. 5, no. 4, 2020, pp. 121-129. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijfmts.2020.029
Chicago
Angayarkanni, S.. "Analysis of vitreous humour in determining postmortem interval (time since death) – A prospective study." IP Int J Forensic Med Toxicol Sci 5, no. 4 (2020): 121-129. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijfmts.2020.029